Sample demoanonymized real script. Live chat and live marking APIs are not available here.

H2 Physics

H2 Physics — 2019 Paper 2 (demo)

Feedback pinned onto the pages the student wrote. Scan the QR (or open the link) for a sample Cherlock clarification chat.

QR code to sample Cherlock chat

Ask Cherlock

Open sample chat
Studyszn QuickMarkStudyszn QuickMark

Demo Student feedback

Score: 50 / 80

General feedback

You scored 50/80 on this Paper 2.

By question: Q1 6/9, Q2 8/13, Q3 10/11, Q4 6/12, Q5 5/11, Q6 15/24.

Strengths: Q1(a)/(b) equilibrium and tensions are clean (T1=1380NT_1 = 1380\,\mathrm{N}, T2=1320NT_2 = 1320\,\mathrm{N}). Q3 is strong overall (potential definition, Z=54Z = 54, acceleration). Q2(b)(iii) Malus graph and Q2(c) time-base are good. Q6(c)/(d)(i) photon and mass-defect calculations are solid.

Next steps:

  • Q1(c): take moments about the base (support cable TT about 280N280\,\mathrm{N}; 150N150\,\mathrm{N} is the given wire tension).
  • Q2(b): apply Malus twice with cos2\cos^2; ITI_T about 0.56I00.56\,I_0 and amplitude ratio about 0.750.75.
  • Q4(a)(ii): use proton mass 1.67×1027kg1.67 \times 10^{-27}\,\mathrm{kg} (not electron mass). Q4(b) was left blank.
  • Q5(b): open-circuit E=12.0VE = 12.0\,\mathrm{V} and rr about 13.3Ω13.3\,\Omega; terminal pd falls when the NTC warms.
  • Q6(b)(i): multiply fractional change by 4.0km4.0\,\mathrm{km}. Finish Q6(d)(ii) intensity. For Q6(f), use low vibration / vacuum / dust advantages.

Mark summary

50 / 80

Overall50 / 80
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 12

No comments on this page.

Page 13
Page 13

No comments on this page.

Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17